Skip to Content

White House says Biden was not making ‘human’ comparison between segregationists and opponents of voting rights bills

<i>Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images</i><br/>
AFP via Getty Images
Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

By Kevin Liptak, CNN

President Joe Biden was not making a “human” comparison between opponents of pending voting rights bills and historical racists and segregationists in his address in Atlanta this week, the White House says.

In his speech calling for new voter protections, Biden asked whether lawmakers wanted “to be the side of Dr. King or George Wallace,” “John Lewis or Bull Connor” or “Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis.”

The comparison generated some blowback afterward, but press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden was not drawing a personal link between current lawmakers and notorious southern segregationists and the president of the Confederacy.

“I think everybody listening to that speech who’s speaking on the level, as my mother would say, would note that he was not comparing them as humans, he was comparing the choice to those figures in history and where they’re going to position themselves as they determine whether they’re going to support the fundamental right to vote or not,” she said Friday.

Pressed about the comparisons on Wednesday, Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin acknowledged the language pushed the envelope.

“Perhaps the President went a little too far in his rhetoric,” Durbin told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “Some of us do.”

Other Democrats said they thought the lines — written with the help of presidential historian Jon Meacham, according to a person familiar with the matter — may have gone over Americans’ heads.

“Nobody knows who Bull Connor is,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said at a news conference. “You know, if we’re making the case to say, ‘We’re going to be with Martin Luther King or Bull Connor’ — who’s that?”

On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris defended the comparisons Thursday, calling them “apt.”

“President Biden took the, I believe, right and courageous step to say that Senate rules should not get in the way of protecting the American people’s access to the ballot. And he compared this time to a previous time in our history, which is apt for comparison,” she said.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2022 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

CNN Newssource

Comments

1 Comment

  1. Yes, the speech in Georgia was one of the most puzzling political events I can remember. His speech made no sense in terms of objective reality. Speeches to support a political proposal need to have a rational development of idea so that people can understand why to support. This speech had none of this. He offered no reasons for his position. A high school debate teacher would have thrown the speech out for lack of coherency.

Leave a Reply

Skip to content